我是考GMAT的，本人水平實(shí)在很菜，但拿到成績(jī)單后竟然有6分，真是FT，主要?dú)w功摸版，我的摸版主要是借鑒一個(gè)6分大牛的，和各位XDJM分享。

　　ISSUE:

　　Recently there is a debate over whether ..Some people assert that.., while other people believe thatAs a matter of fact, the issue of whether .. is a complex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is not a universal answer to this question, and whether one choice takes precedence over the other may quite depend on the specific situation. The decision, nevertheless, is not an easy one to make. Actually, the final judgment should rely on a case-by-case analysis. As far as I am concerned, however, I agree that . , and do not agree that.. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

　　The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that A good example may be found in the case that Under this circumstance, it is obvious that.

　　In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. The reason is not far to seek. To illustrate, let us consider that Hence, another equally important aspect is that.

　　Admittedly, it may be true that . in some conditions. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that .,Actually, these cases are rare and therefore are too specific and too weak to strengthen the view thatWhen the advantages and disadvantages of x and y are carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is obvious that

　　To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to generate an integrate whole and thus become more convincing than any single one of them, we may be comfortable to say that ., because.

　　ARGUMENT

　　In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that

　　Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.

　　 In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A does not necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.

　　In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.

　　In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Lacking this assumption, the conclusion that is entirely unfounded. In fact, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from B are applicable to A. Differences between A and B clearly out weight the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

　　In addition, the conclusion unjustifiably relies on the poll while the validity of the survey itself is doubtful. The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who, when, how and by whom the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results are worthless as evidence to support that.　

　　Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either/or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.

　　To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author claims. To make the argument more convincing concerning. , the arguer would have to provide more information that. The arguer should also demonstrate that.to make this argument logically acceptable.

　　Since the author commits the above mentioned logical mistakes and fails to consider the whole situation comprehensively, his ideas should not be adopted. The conclusion would be strengthened if he.

　　In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that . Because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.

　　我是考GMAT的，本人水平實(shí)在很菜，但拿到成績(jī)單后竟然有6分，真是FT，主要?dú)w功摸版，我的摸版主要是借鑒一個(gè)6分大牛的，和各位XDJM分享。

　　ISSUE:

　　Recently there is a debate over whether ..Some people assert that.., while other people believe thatAs a matter of fact, the issue of whether .. is a complex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is not a universal answer to this question, and whether one choice takes precedence over the other may quite depend on the specific situation. The decision, nevertheless, is not an easy one to make. Actually, the final judgment should rely on a case-by-case analysis. As far as I am concerned, however, I agree that . , and do not agree that.. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

　　The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that A good example may be found in the case that Under this circumstance, it is obvious that.

　　In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. The reason is not far to seek. To illustrate, let us consider that Hence, another equally important aspect is that.

　　Admittedly, it may be true that . in some conditions. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that .,Actually, these cases are rare and therefore are too specific and too weak to strengthen the view thatWhen the advantages and disadvantages of x and y are carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is obvious that

　　To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to generate an integrate whole and thus become more convincing than any single one of them, we may be comfortable to say that ., because.

　　ARGUMENT

　　In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that

　　Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.

　　 In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A does not necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.

　　In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.

　　In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Lacking this assumption, the conclusion that is entirely unfounded. In fact, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from B are applicable to A. Differences between A and B clearly out weight the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

　　In addition, the conclusion unjustifiably relies on the poll while the validity of the survey itself is doubtful. The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who, when, how and by whom the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results are worthless as evidence to support that.　

　　Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either/or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.

　　To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author claims. To make the argument more convincing concerning. , the arguer would have to provide more information that. The arguer should also demonstrate that.to make this argument logically acceptable.

　　Since the author commits the above mentioned logical mistakes and fails to consider the whole situation comprehensively, his ideas should not be adopted. The conclusion would be strengthened if he.

　　In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that . Because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.